https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 Facilitators of effective interprofessional collaborative practice for physiotherapy private practitioners: An interpretive descriptive study https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:52422 Wed 11 Oct 2023 12:05:53 AEDT ]]> Physiotherapy private practitioners’ opinions regarding interprofessional collaborative practice: A qualitative study https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:54139 Tue 06 Feb 2024 11:49:40 AEDT ]]> Development of a survey instrument to explore the characteristics of Australian private physiotherapy practitioners' interprofessional interactions https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:38729 Thu 20 Jan 2022 13:57:01 AEDT ]]> Can simulation replace part of clinical time?: two parallel randomised controlled trials https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:21782 Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:00:39 AEDT ]]> Simulation can contribute a part of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy clinical education: two randomized trials https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:19777 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:56:52 AEDT ]]> Promoting effective interprofessional collaborative practice in the primary care setting: recommendations from Queensland physiotherapy private practitioners https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:54971 Mon 25 Mar 2024 15:20:41 AEDT ]]> Allied health professionals' perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: an integrative review https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:46400 Journal of Interprofessional Care. The Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality of included papers. Study findings were extracted, critically examined and grouped into themes. Twelve studies conducted in six different countries met the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis revealed five themes: (1) shared philosophy; (2) communication and clinical interaction; (3) physical environment; (4) power and hierarchy; and (5) financial considerations. This review has identified diverse key elements related to interprofessional collaboration in primary health care, as perceived by allied health professionals. Opportunity for frequent, informal communication appeared essential for interprofessional collaboration to occur. Allied health professionals working in close proximity to health practitioners from other professions had more regular interprofessional interactions than those who were geographically separated. Co-location of multiple primary health care services within the same physical space may offer increased opportunities for interprofessional collaboration. Future research should avoid reporting on allied health professionals in primary health care collectively, and isolate data to the individual professions. Direct observational methods are warranted to investigate whether allied health professionals’ perceptions of interprofessional collaboration align with their actual clinical interactions in primary health care settings.]]> Fri 18 Nov 2022 14:48:51 AEDT ]]>